Search for: "United States, et al v. J-M Manufacturing, et al" Results 1 - 20 of 72
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am by MBettman
Linert et al. v Adrien Foutz, et al., At issue is whether a manufacturer has a duty to warn purchasers of known risks associated with the product after a sale is made, and whether the manufacturer’s implementation of an improvement program triggers a post-marketing duty to warn. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 5:55 am by Barbara Bavis
  Further, the United States Supreme Court recently heard arguments in Vance v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm by Schachtman
In 1982, JM sold the Stockton facility to the J-M Manufacturing Co., and the J-M A/C Pipe Corp., which were unaffiliated with JM. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
., Inc. (30-CA-12855, et al.; 349 NLRB No. 18) Milwaukee, WI Jan. 31, 2007. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
First, not all foodborne illnesses are reported to CDC as described by Mead et al (1999). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Between the years 1973 and 2011, one hundred of nearly 2,000 Salmonella outbreaks in the United States were traced back to beef, leading to 3,684 illnesses.[1] Salmonella is omnipresent in feedlot cattle. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 6:53 am
  (26-CA-22031, et al.; 351 NLRB No. 74) Grenada, MS Dec. 21, 2007. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 11:08 am by H&A Newscaster
Bird B Gone, Inc et al., was litigated in the United States District Court – Central District (Los Angeles), case Number 8:19-cv-00847-SK, with the Honorable Magistrate Judge Steve Kim presiding. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am by Ricky E. Bagolie
OCs (Estimated Relative Risk or Odds Ratio with 95% CI) Bloemenkamp et al,[8]1995 Case-Control 2.2 (0.9-5.4) Spitzer (Transnational),[9] 1996 Case-Control 1.5 (1.1-2.2) Bloemankamp et al,[13] 1999 Case-Control 1.9 (0.8-4.5) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[14] 2000 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.3-2.8)/2.3 (1.3-3.9) Farley et al (WHO),[6] 1995 Case-Control 2.4 (1.3-4.6) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[7] 1995 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Only a few states allow retail stores or farmers’ markets to sell raw milk, while others restrict sales to on-farm purchases, or ban raw milk altogether (Oliver et al, 2009). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Working Arrangements Across Employment Sectors by Percentage of Workers In their own survey, Barrero et al. measured the full-time working arrangements in the United States as of 2023, identifying the percentage of employees who work fully onsite, fully remote, and those who have a hybrid arrangement. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:54 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld a district court order denying class certification in a nationwide Title VII gender discrimination action in Tabor, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
Contamination occurring in the farm environment may be amplified during fresh-cut produce manufacturing/processing if appropriate preventive controls are not in place. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]